The
Obama Administration has proven time and again its disdain for the U.S.
Constitution - which is viewed as an impediment to accomplishing their
surreptitious goal of imposing their will on the American people.
Yes,
this Architect of Destruction was
re-elected by a majority of voters. That particular majority is composed of those who
benefit primarily from government "entitlement programs", such as
Welfare and Medicaid, in which the beneficiary has no investment. Programs into
which the worker's taxes are diverted to support those who are uninterested in
becoming self-supporting. This is an obvious conflict of interest, and these
people should not be allowed to vote. Who comprises this "majority
of voters"? Single issue voters - the under-informed and those
unconcerned about the continued success of our country - they are the, "What's
in it for me?" crowd.
·
Those
who choose to let the government support them, as opposed to those who are
self-sufficient - 4th and 5th generation welfare
recipients. For them, living off the earnings of others has become the
"family business", passed along from parent to child. They are lured
into the voting booth by the promise of continued - and increased - government
support. (Single issue voters)
·
Those
who are in this country illegally, who also benefit from those same government
entitlement programs, and who are promised amnesty and citizenship
by the government's incumbent leadership, as a reward for circumventing
our country's immigration laws. They are criminals from the day
they enter our country… if not before. (Single issue voters)
·
The
extended resident families of illegal residents, who wish their relatives to be
closer so they can interact with them on a more regular basis. (Single issue
voters)
·
Socialist-"Progressives",
who believe that the fruits of those who labor should be evenly divided between
the worker and those who choose not to work. These people are the
self-appointed "social conscience" of our nation. They have a warped
philosophy that demands those who do nothing for themselves have an
inherent, God-given right to live as well as those who actually work
to provide for themselves and their family. (Single issue voters)
·
Those
who suffer from White Guilt Syndrome, and who feel the only cure is to
vote for anybody who is not of the Caucasian persuasion. (Single issue voters)
·
Those
who are unfamiliar with, and unconcerned about, the overreaching
long-term effects of socialist-style governance. The "Can I reasonably
expect this to have any impact upon my
daily life?" gang. (Single issue voters)
Swatches
of Obama's life reveal little… but, when viewed as "whole
cloth", the influences on Obama's life comprise a who's who of the radical
leftist movement, and it becomes painfully apparent that not only is Obama a
willing participant in that movement, he has spent most of his adult life
deeply immersed in it.
I
will now introduce Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, authors of …
The Cloward-Piven Strategy
of Orchestrated Crisis
This
strategy was first seen in the May 2, 1966 issue of The Nation magazine by a
pair of radical socialist Columbia University professors - Richard Andrew
Cloward and Frances Fox Piven. David Horowitz encapsulates it thusly:
The strategy of forcing political change through orchestrated crisis. The "Cloward-Piven
Strategy" seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the
government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society
into crisis and economic collapse.
Cloward
and Piven were inspired by radical organizer [and Hillary Clinton mentor] Saul
Alinsky:
"Make
the enemy live up to their own book of rules," Alinsky wrote in his 1989
book Rules for Radicals. "When pressed to honor every word
of every law and statute, every Judeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit
promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short.
The system's failure to 'live up' to its rule book can then be used to
discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist 'rule book' with a
socialist one."
Cloward
and Piven were specific about the kind of "crisis" they were trying
to create:
By
crisis, we mean a publicly visible disruption in some institutional
sphere. Crisis can occur spontaneously (e.g., riots) or as the intended result
of tactics of demonstration and protest which either generate institutional
disruption or bring unrecognized disruption to public attention.
No
matter where the strategy is implemented, it shares the following features:
1.
The
offensive organizes previously unorganized groups eligible for government
benefits but not currently receiving all they can.
2.
The
offensive seeks to identify new beneficiaries and/or create new benefits.
3. The overarching aim is always to impose new
stresses on target systems, with the ultimate goal of forcing their
collapse.
The preceding is
Cloward-Piven in a nutshell (see diagram of C-P at the end of this post - for specific details Google Cloward Piven Strategy).
This constitutes the crux - the backbone - of the Cloward-Piven
Strategy. Now, in light of this explanation of strategy, look back and review
Obama's actions over the past four years…
·
Extending
unemployment benefits beyond anything this country has ever seen. As the
economy slowly tanked, due to the surreptitious efforts of our currently
left-wing dominated government, unemployment naturally increased. If
people are buying fewer products made by XYZ Corporation, XYZ will necessarily
have to reduce their overhead costs of production in order to satisfy their
obligations to stockholders. Where can they most easily do this? The costs of
labor and quality of materials used to produce the product. This is achieved
through layoffs of ambiguous/redundant personnel, and reduction in the quality
of ingredients/ parts/components used in the manufacturing process. These
reductions also activate "trickle down unemployment", in that their
suppliers of materials may be forced to follow suit in their factory based
upon reduced product demand, and on and on. (See above C-P "…thus pushing
society into crisis and economic collapse.")
·
Increasing
Welfare benefits by providing goods and services well beyond those of
"necessities". Instead of
providing only food "staples" (Flour, Wheat, Salt, Pepper,
Rice, Dried Beans, Yeast, Butter, Milk, Cheese, etc.), EBT (Electronic Benefits
Transfer) Cards can be used for frozen meals, cut meats, sectioned poultry,
shrimp, lobster, etc. - food items that many working people cannot afford.
They can now even be used at fast food restaurants! (Another
wound "…thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.")
·
The
"Occupy" movement(s) - designed to disrupt the flow of various
private financial, educational and government institutions. (C-P strategy:
"Crisis can occur spontaneously (e.g., riots) or as the intended result
of tactics of demonstration and protest." and "… thus pushing
society into crisis and economic collapse.")
·
Creating
a Cabinet replete with persons whose political philosophies are inimical to the
interests of the United States, and giving aid and support to foreign political
entities (like Egypt, now run by the Muslim Brotherhood, and
linked to
numerous terrorist organizations, to whom our government just sold 20 F-16
fighter jets and 200 Abrams M1 tanks) whose avowed goal is the annihilation of Israel,
and the establishment of a world-wide Islamic theocracy and Caliphate,
governing by the draconian laws of "Sharia". Giving "aid
and support" to our enemies was once considered to be an act of
treason. Why has Obama not been impeached for this treasonous act (just one of
his many violations of our Constitutions)?
We also have an
abuse of power through Executive Order. Obama uses it as a tool to bypass
Congress when he doesn't want a vote. "Executive Order 13621: WHITE HOUSE
INITIATIVE ON EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE FOR AFRICAN AMERICANS" is a prime
example of this. Executive Office racism! Why should African-Americans - specifically
- need an edict from the White house on "educational excellence"?
Why not specify Native Americans, or Latino Americans… or simply Americans
in general? Why not issue an EO demanding that all Americans become self-motivated
to excel in their educational endeavors?
An Executive
Order becomes law 30 days after signing… unless it is challenged
by Congress. Where are the
Congressional challenges? Where are our "checks and balances"? Where
are the few elected representatives of the people who may have
the cojones to question the demands of The Great Usurper? (I say "may"
because the existence of any such people in Congress is highly questionable.)
The demonstrated irresponsibility of our "leadership" in all three
branches of Government is appalling!
(More wounds to the Constitution)
Socialism as a
practical form of government is anathema to a still slight majority of
Americans… those who yet believe in the
Democratic Republic, and those who toil for wages. As Margaret Thatcher so
succinctly worded it, “The problem with socialism is that you eventually run
out of other people's money. ”
Obama's solution
to that noteworthy "problem", is to borrow more money to
distribute frivolously, and then, to print more money
which is worth less because there are no reserves behind the paper that it's
printed on! We are not only on the financial path to becoming the world's
next Greece, we are on the Hyperinflation Expressway to becoming the
world's next Zimbabwe. (During the height of inflation from 2008 to
2009, it was difficult to measure Zimbabwe's hyperinflation because the
government of Zimbabwe stopped filing official inflation statistics.
However, Zimbabwe's peak month of inflation is estimated at 6.5 sextillion
percent in mid-November 2008. In March of 2008, a loaf of bread cost
10,000,000 $Z. Yes, that's TEN MILLION ZIMBABWE DOLLARS! In 2009,
Zimbabwe abandoned its currency. As of 2012, Zimbabwe still had no national currency;
currencies from other countries are used.)
No comments:
Post a Comment