Goodbye Barry - Welcome Home AMERICA!

Saturday, September 27, 2014

Jeh Johnson: Amnesty Will Cause Terrorists to ‘Come Forward’ and Submit Background Checks

Jeh Johnson doesn't have a CLUE about security, yet he is the Secretary of Homeland Security.  Just one more shining example of the appalling ignorance running rampant in the "Executve Branch" of our government.   Obozo has done everything he can to insure that the America we know and love becomes a skeleton of what it had been in the past.

I HOPE this CHANGE is something we can reverse, and the only thing "transparent" about his administration is that he is taking revenge upon We the People for something that was ended 151 years ago - by Abe Lincoln, on January 1, 1863.
Obozo continues to follow the (manu)scripts prepared by neo-Marxist Saul Alinsky (Rules for Radicals), and the combined efforts of Richard Cloward and Frances Piven (Cloward-Piven Strategy of Orchestrated Crisis) which seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.

Cloward and Piven were inspired by radical organizer and Hillary Clinton mentor Saul Alinsky. Alinsky's approach was dark genius; "Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system's failure to "live up" to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist "rule book" with a socialist one."
The Cloward-Piven Strategy took it one step further by instructing young socialists to, "...hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse."

So, here we are today... with a seemingly never-ending string of CRISES, and an ECONOMY that is teetering on the brink of BANKRUPTCY. Of course, the left will blame it all on Bush the Younger, and a Congress in which the Republicans/Conservative have created stumbling blocks that cannot be overcome. This would be done in an attempt to justify and legitimize the improper use of Executive Orders by Obozo... our first undocumented president. Legitimacy aside, there is little question that our "Ship of State" is crewed by an agglomeration of idiots, and that ship is named HMS TITANIC!

 God save us from the stupidity of ignorant, one-issue American voters! Jeh Johnson could well-be the poster child for "Ineptitude of Government Officials"... and, that's my 2¢!

Saturday, September 20, 2014

Our Government's Focus In the "War on Terrorism" Is Americans...

Would you like to know where our government is putting it's emphasis on terrorism? Right here in the USA... but the focus is upon US! Here's an excerpt from WND:
"(Attorney General Eric) Holder believed, said Chumley, “America’s biggest threat is Americans with guns – not ISIS terrorists with a stated goal of spreading the caliphate throughout the world.”

“And that’s why ISIS continues to spread, and will continue to spread,” she said.

WND reported last week a case against an alleged Muslim terrorist who reportedly described his brutal killing of New Jersey teen Brendan Tevlin “for being American” as a “just kill.”

“It was, in fact, an act of jihad, perpetrated by a fellow American who sympathized more with those who want to annihilate us than with his own country and its people,” said radio host Todd Pettengill of “The Todd Show” on WPLJ in New York City.

He recounted the declaration by the suspect, Ali Muhammad Brown, 29, that the June 25 attack was a “just kill.”

“Domestic terrorism, no matter what the president says, is already here,” he warned.

During the first few weeks of his presidency, Obama spotlighted what he saw as a serious “right-wing” threat."

The "right-wing" is, of course, American patriots who believe in our Constitution's Bill of Rights, and hold in disdain those who attempt to thwart the intent of that document. For more details on the WND report, go to: 
That's my 2¢ worth!

Wednesday, August 6, 2014

Representative Mo Brooks Claims Discriminating Against Whites Is Legal...

Representative Mo Brooks (R- Ala) recently said, "If you look at current federal law, there is only one skin color that you can lawfully discriminate against. That’s Caucasians — whites."

As I see things, it's not so much that we can legally be discriminated against, it is that ALL OTHERS have been put into a legally PROTECTED CLASS in which whites and Christians were intentionally not included. The law does NOT say, "It's legal to discriminate against white people", it just doesn't give whites the special protections that "minority groups" enjoy. This arrangement ignorantly presupposes that whites are the only race that improperly discriminates against others.

Discrimination is a product of prejudice, and prejudice is a LEARNED behavior - there is no innate "dislike of the unlike". People are not BORN instinctively 'hating' ANYBODY for any reason... they acquire their dislikes from interactions with others. Some prejudices are inherited, much as physical characteristics are inherited. The "authority figures" in one's life, have great influence upon the nurturing development of one's personality and character.

If Dad and/or Mom have a strong dislike of people of color, that dislike will be taught - unthinkingly, subliminally, or intentionally - to the child. But, our "authority figures" range far afield - teachers, clergy, peers and the extended family, compose those who influence our development. If the hate mantra is repeated often enough by many (or most) of those figures it becomes ingrained, because the expression of identical feelings are reinforced by praise and recognition from those we consider "important" in our life. Such 'learning' is not entirely inherited, some is based upon personal interactions and negative experiences... BUT, the background of prejudices expressed by others, does make one hyper-vigilant when dealing with those who are 'different'.
The "bottom line", however, is that when there are SPECIAL PROTECTIONS put in place for SOME, there is no longer "EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW" as established by the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Equal Protection Clause was implemented to ensure the fair treatment of ALL legal citizens of the United States. That's my 2¢ worth...

Saturday, July 26, 2014

Understanding Obama's Actions... from MY Perspective

It seems that many people either don't understand Oblamer's background and training, and automatically assume that he is "stupid". First of all he was ostensibly "elected" to the office by a majority of voters, and with the blessings of the Electoral College. This says more about the ignorance of our voters than it does about Oblamer. It also assumes that the election was FAIR, and that those 100% Obama precincts in various parts of the country, were NOT an indication of voter fraud or systemic corruption. Two really BIG assumptions!

Oblamer, as are we all, is a product of both nurture and nature. He was raised in a family of Communist/Socialist/Marxists. His father was an anti-western Muslim, and Oblamer attended Muslim schools during his formative years. He was mentored by the likes of Jeremiah Wright and Frank Marshall Davis (anti-white, anti-American Communist). The anti-white, anti-American, anti-western, anti-capitalist authority figures continued through his higher education, as well. These included professor Edward Said at Columbia, a spokesman for Palestinian terrorists, and professor Derrick Bell at the Harvard Law School. Bell was an advocate of “critical race theory” — an uncritical mishmash of notions by a man who said that he saw his role as deliberately annoying white people. When he entered politics, he was embraced by William Ayers - a domestic terrorist who planted bombs in public places, including the Pentagon. Ayers hosted fundraisers for Oblamer.

A critical look at his background makes it crystal clear that what many, if not MOST people see as mistakes and failed policies, are actually SUCCESSES to Oblamer. Each 'error' is carefully crafted based upon what is a foreign ideology to most Americans. His goal is to embarrass us internationally and destroy our economy, reducing the United States to the poverty level of some third-world, Banana Republic... like his birthplace of Kenya!

Oblamer is a charlatan, a conman, a snake-oil salesman... or, in a single word, a POLITICIAN. He is also so successful in pulling off those scams, he has become the consummate usurper. Unfortunately, he is also a hardwired Communist/Socialist/Marxist Muslim, who lied his way into the most powerful office in the free world, and is now busying himself with destroying that FREE WORLD. That's my 2¢ worth...

Sunday, April 13, 2014


According to "Survival Joe" there are ten thing we have learned from the Bundy Ranch standoff in Nevada.  I can find nothing in his list with which to take issue, so for those of you who have not seen it, here it is (Fair Use applies):
"Here are 10 things we’ve learned from the Bundy Ranch standoff so far:
#1. The federal government has absolutely no respect for state rights.
#2. If we are to believe the BLM, they care more about the “rights” of desert tortoises than the rights of human beings.
#3. Force is the only language the BLM knows how to speak. This bureau is just as bad as any other power-tripping government agency, of which there are many: CIA, FBI, NSA, NEA, EPA, ATF, FDA, etc.
#4. Nevada Senator Harry Reid is perhaps the greediest and most corrupt politician in Washington. (Actually, we already knew that, but this just reinforces it.)
#5. All those Nevadans who have positions of authority in the government (Governor Brian Sandoval, Clark County Sheriff Douglas Gillespie, cCounty Commissioner Tom Collins, etc.) are either complicit with the federal government’s attempt to steal the Bundy’s cattle or they are too scared to do anything about it.
#6. Whenever the government offers justification for the use of force, there is always a stated reason — the pretext — and then there is the real reason, which usually has to do with profits and power. In the case of the BLM’s cattle-grab, the pretext was to protect the desert tortoise. The real reason was to build a solar farm.
#7. When Americans show up in numbers to oppose illegal government action, the Feds back down.
#8. The Feds have no problem spilling American blood on foreign soil (using drone strikes), but are not yet ready to openly spill American blood on American soil. (As “Phil Dirt” pointed out in the comments, the federal government has killed Americans on American soil — David Koresh and his followers being the most obvious example — but it has always been done under some kind of pretense.)
#9. If something like this can happen in Nevada, it can happen in any of the other 49 states.
#10. There is no limit to what the federal government will do to strip states of their sovereignty and further enslave the American people."
Any questions?

Sunday, February 2, 2014

GOP Establishment Secretly Pining for Mitt Romney in 2016?

Unfortunately, Mitt Romney is not a strong conservative candidate, and conservative VOTERS tend to follow their own personal convictions when they vote. Romney is not tremendously popular among grassroots Republican, either. On the other hand, Hillary IS a strong Democrat candidate. She is well-liked within the party, simply because the Dems will support their own... regardless of their lack of qualifications (as was demonstrated in 2008 and 2012).

Romney lost his first bid to become POTUS for several reasons, not the least of which is: Republicans and conservatives need AT LEAST a quasi-valid reason to vote for a candidate! Put a "D" behind Vladimir Putin's name, appoint Satan HIMSELF as his campaign manager, and the Dem's WILL vote for him!

Please don't misunderstand... I don't classify Mitt Romney as a "bad guy". Unfortunately that is another reason for his failed campaign. He is TOO NICE... too much of a gentleman to "roll around in the mud" with his opponent! Romney stays on the high ground and takes the shots, while his opponent takes cover behind trees and in the trenches, and snipes at him.

There is also the religious issue to be overcome. Many people misunderstand the LDS/"Mormon" religion, and do not see it as a qualifying "Christian" religion. The "Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints" has been wrongly classified as a "cult religion" because their method of worship and their internal rituals are somewhat foreign to mainstream Christianity.

People whose sense of honor is stronger than their sense of survival, rarely do well in politics - especially at the national level. They are ill-prepared to face the street-fighters ensconced within the walls and halls of the Capitol Building.

Romney needs to train like Rocky Balboa, but he seems to lack that "Rocky" hunger. He gave the subconscious impression that he didn't really care if he won the most prestigious office on planet Earth. He does not radiate the strength of character that conservative voters desire in a candidate, even though he does seem to possess that quality.

I'm afraid that if Mitt is the best candidate they have, the GOP - and the USA - will lose once again. Being the best person is NOT the same as being the BEST CANDIDATE! And that's my 2¢ worth.

Sunday, January 19, 2014

MOVIE REVIEW - "LONE SURVIVOR" - 5 out of 5 stars

Our Navy SEALS receive the most punishing physical and psychological training in the world! It borders upon cruel and unusual punishment! They are highly focused individuals who, by nature, do not believe in quitting before the job is finished. They can go without food, drink or sleep for extended periods, they can be isolated on a mountain top or in a desert for days without moving, if that's what the mission requires. These brave, dedicated men perform almost superhuman feats of endurance at the direction of the "leaders" of our once-great nation, knowing full-well that the odds do not favor their return.

My comments above are not meant to diminish the performance or sacrifices of our other special military teams (Spec'l Forces, Delta Force, etc), as they are all MEN among men, head and shoulders above the crowd - but this thread is not about them. We should all be thankful that we have men of such fortitude and courage serving us, and respect and honor them!

The movie itself is exceptionally well-done. Based upon a true story, the story line, acting, cinematography, and special effects were all exceptional. The experience was "almost like being there" (without wagering my own life). I felt like these were men I knew and respected.  There were only two other movies in my life that I have left feeling "uneasy"... Black Hawk Down and We Were Soldiers. If you can afford the price of a ticket (and many can't at today's high prices) Lone Survivor is well-worth seeing!

Friday, January 10, 2014


Regarding same-sex committed relationships. According to AG Eric Holder, "This ruling (the high court's June decision) marked a historic step toward equality for all American families," Holder said. "And since the day it was handed down, the Department of Justice has been working tirelessly to implement it in both letter and spirit."

Congress would not allow Utah to be annexed as a state unless the Utah state constitution would outlaw polygamy (one husband with multiple wives). Also, the US government began seizing church property; but gave it back once polygamy was outlawed. A "family" is not constituted of people of the same sex - "As the basic unit for raising children, anthropologists most generally classify family organization as matrifocal (a mother and her children); conjugal (a husband, his wife, and children; also called nuclear family); avuncular (for example a brother, his sister, and her children); or extended family in which parents and children co-reside with other members of one parent's family."

The polygamous family is as much - if not MORE - of a "family" than one headed by people of the same sex, who cannot produce children or continue a family bloodline. Perhaps polygamy should be legalized, if a state's right to not recognize same-sex marriages are unconstitutional. The legalization of same-sex "marriages" is (ostensibly) based upon "equal protection under the law". I'm sure there a sheep-lovers who would like to "marry" one of their flock also, so let's legalize that while we're at it. There are also those perverts who would enjoy having sex with their own children, so let's let them get "married" too! They are equally entitled to the protection of the law. Of course, NEITHER of those suggestions are made seriously, but rather to point out the wrong thinking behind same-sex "marriages".

The compromise solution to the resistance against same-sex relationships may simply be in the desired appellation itself. Reserve the definition of "marriage" in it's originally intended context, and use "Civil Union" to describe same-sex committed relationships. There is no harm in allowing them the same privileges as those of a "married" man-woman relationship, but the thrust of the argument by gays seems to be one of SEMANTICS, as opposed to something more practical! Legal recognition would provide gays with 100% of something, fighting over semantics may bring them 100% of nothing.

The "Log Cabin Republicans", composed of gays who vote Republican, are supporting same-sex "marriage". Which begs the question, how far do they wish to push the "log" into the "cabin"? Just my 2¢ worth.

Sunday, December 8, 2013


This will be short - "income inequality" is not a cause, but an effect! "Income inequality" is the result of poor preparation on the part of certain individuals. Those who struggle at the bottom of the income ladder, are those who failed to take advantage of educational and/or technical training opportunities. They are the unmotivated - the high school dropouts, the indolent, and those who chose to allow themselves to become dependent upon the government for their support.

They are those who, by their own inaction, have failed to properly prepare themselves for success in the labor market. These people cannot compete for higher paying jobs. They will never become a Chief Executive Officer of anything requiring greater management skills than a yard service. They do not create jobs for more than a very few others (lawnmower pushers), because they lack the organizational skills to build a successful large-scale company.

There's a saying that states, coined by the United Negro College Fund in 1972 (prior the the elevation of Negroes to "African-Americans"), "A mind is a terrible thing to waste." The accuracy of that statement cannot reasonably be challenged. Along those same lines, Alexander Pope penned this timeless prose in 1709:
"A little learning is a dangerous thing;
drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring:
there shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,
and drinking largely sobers us again."

In Greek Mythology, the Pierian Spring of Macedonia was sacred to the Muses.The spring was believed to be a fountain of knowledge that inspires whosoever drinks from it.

To me, Pope's message is a warning that those who learn "just enough" will convince themselves that they have mastered the subject or skill, and become "puffed up" about their knowledge. Whereas those who have mastered the subject/skill, know that which they know. They also know that there may yet be even more to learn, and continue to expand their knowledge, thereby producing  improvements their field(s) of endeavor.

Those who know little - and do little - deserve little! Simply being present upon this planet is not sufficient justification for great rewards... or ANY rewards. We must apply ourselves and produce - either independently, or for an employer - before we may reap the benefits of our labors.

Obama's "pipe dream" (originally an allusion to the dreams experienced by smokers of opium pipes) to create income equality lacks viability... unless the goal is the total destruction of the American economy. Requiring others to contribute from their earnings, so that those who choose to retain their energies may profit from doing nothing, is both a morally and logically corrupt concept.

Saturday, November 9, 2013

The Statement Was Made Online, "Republicans just can't resist the temptation to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory"

That statement - declaring that Republicans just can't resist the temptation to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory - may be true. It is my considered opinion that the GOP capitulates so quickly because they have no faith in their supporting voter base, who - in turn - acquire even less faith in the GOP.

This "lack of faith" I just mentioned, manifests itself in the form of what I see as a "symbiotic political mobius strip", with two components - the RNC and the conservative voters - at opposite ends of the mobius strip. As one impacts upon the other it comes to rest, the impacted component moves around the strip to the other end, where it gains momentum coming out of the curve - and the process repeats... as does the theoretical concept of "perpetual motion". The GOP sees a dissipation of support among their base, so they try to replace some of the lost conservative voters by portraying an image of "we are all things to all people", thereby driving more conservative voters away from the GOP support base, and into an attitude of apathy for the GOP. And the process repeats over and over.

Why? Because the RNC is too far out of touch with their "base" to recognize that when the GOP collapses under the slightest pressure from the left, they obscure their own identity as the "loyal opposition" and become collaborators. The majority of the numbers in the GOP voter base is NOT with the big money donors, but with the people. Those who vote "R" at the booth because they DO NOT want socialism running rampant within the confines of our once-great nation. Why would anybody vote for a party composed primarily of collaborators?

I can see where - in the not too distant future - a viable 3rd Party could arise from the ashes left by disaffected GOP conservatives. In order to be a successful challenger, they will need a NATIONAL NAME - one with positive recognition (not a name like Al 'remember Tawana Brawley' Sharpton)! Our so-called "Two-Party system" has become more of a "one-party-with-a-slightly-out-of-focus-reflection-in-the-mirror system". We need to be able to clearly distinguish between political parties, because without any distinctions why even bother to vote? And THAT'S another contributing factor to conservative voter apathy, but... unfortunately, the liberal Demonrats (the vast majority of whom actually cast their VOTES) see it as proof that their way is the right way - because they win elections!

Remember WHO did WHAT to us when the Senate mid-term elections come in November 2014, and especially which Party forced us to accept a incomprehensibly expensive, and inefficient alternative to our usual health care. Tell your family, friends and neighbors, that the road back to success for our Constitutional Republic is dependent upon conservative fiscal and social values.!