Goodbye Barry - Welcome Home AMERICA!

Sunday, October 12, 2014

Clinton document dump details info on Monica Lewinsky, Whitewater, Vince Foster

This following, is what I think is an interesting discussion of an online Washington Times article between myself and another person who appears to be quite politically naive...




Of all the things that happened during the Clinton administration, I would love to know if Vince Foster was ASSISTED in his "suicide".
 
Yeh, someone took his own pistol, out of his own safe, in his own house, and then shot him. Right.
 
In the political world there are many "strange happenings" that seem to be borderline impossible to most people. In general, I try to not dismiss anything as "impossible", but it becomes most difficult do when powerful politicians and political networking are involved. Acts such as you describe have been done before and labeled "suicide", even in the "civilian" population. Hillary would not dirty her own hands... she would dispatch a minion.
Everything you say is true. However, I think it is a stretch that Ms. Clinton stole the man's pistol, killed him, and moved the body. And if you say she had help, that would mean a bunch of people know, and they would have had tremendous power over her. She may be many things, but she is not stupid.
Mr. Foster had been suffering from depression for quite some time.
 
Foster was involved in an investigation of the Clinton's finances, and reportedly made a phone call to Hillary Clinton, in Los Angeles, just hours before his death.  Recently, the signed report of M.E. Dr. Donald Haut was uncovered at the National Archives, proving that Foster had a previously unreported gunshot wound to his neck. (I wonder why it wasn't all over the news?)  Finally, an FBI memo has surfaced dated the day after the date of the official autopsy, in which the autopsy technician informs the FBI that there was NO exit wound.The "suicide" note, (leaked despite official efforts to keep it from view) has since been revealed to be a forgery. Have you ever seen the list of people associated with the Clinton administration who died of something other than natural causes? It includes roughly 25 people.
 
Yes, I've seen all this before. Two different Independent Councils--one being Ken Starr--conducted investigations that concluded that it was suicide. In addition to police investigations, both a House and a Senate committee were convened to investigate. They determined that it was suicide.
I imagine all this will be brought up again during the 2016 election, and I doubt if anyone's mind will be changed.
 
In a political hierarchy, the outcome of an "investigation" is predetermined by what the level directly above desires that outcome to be. Each subordinate level facilitates fulfilling the desires of the top level. You seem to repeatedly forget that we're talking about POLITICIANS, not "normal" people. These are people with various and sundry "resources" that would boggle our minds! These are networks within networks, in which connections are layered and people have "hooks" into others... some of whom are unsavory (to put it nicely). "Independent" counsels are independent only insofar as no DIRECT connection can be made between them and the subject of the investigation. It does NOT mean they cannot be intimidated, swayed, coerced or corrupted by the words/deeds of a third-party.
 
 I admire - to some degree - your political naivete. You apparently believe that people are inherently good, as once did I... many years ago. I sitll believe that many (if not most) people are inherently good. But, when evil threatens to do harm to good, in a manner both effective and virtually undetectable, good will unfailingly return to it's seat. There are few human beings who are uncorruptible, particularly those who have climbed the ladder of political success, because they UNDERSTAND what the people above them can have done to them and theirs.
 
In case you were wondering, I do love my country... but I do not have full faith and confidence in those who are navigating our "Ship of State"! That ship's name is the Titanic!

 

Sunday, October 5, 2014

THE EIGHTH CRUSADE HAS BEGUN... BROUGHT TO THE WORLD BY ISLAM!

The world just seems to be a bit - like GLACIALLY - slow to recognize that fact!  Islam has declared WAR on the entire world with it's pronouncement of killing all those who are not with them, in order to establish their new "World Caliphate".  Just because a country has not declared a war, doesn't mean they should ignore a siege condition when it is brought to them.  The approach being used by "radical" Islam is the same one used to boil a frog - raise the temperature slowly or he will jump from the pot.  Chip away here and there, initially staying within your own geographical confines to minimize the outsiders concern over your growth.  As their successes continue they will be emboldened to send small groups of "agents provocateur", to other locations around the world, with the goal of creating isolated incidents of disruption and destruction - again, in the hopes of creating losses without suffering losses.

Notice that when I referred to radical Islam above, I put the word radical within quotation marks.  The reason for the added emphasis is that the blame has been placed upon a nondescript group of Muslim worshipers, whose aim is to take over the world.  If they are just "radicals", why has not mainstream Islam become outraged over the radicals perversion of "Allah's" word, and excommunicated (or whatever the Muslim version of excommunication may be) them from the religion?  Why has "mainstream Islam" not taken up arms against them?  Possibly because the cowardly radicals of Islam, hide themselves within the civilian population.  They wear no distinctive uniform, they represent to state or nation other than the "nation" of Islam.  It is virtually impossible to identify an enemy who blends in with the civilian population, hence the "scorched Earth" military philosophy.  Scorched Earth does not differentiate between enemy and civilian.  The essence of "scorched Earth", is that anyone not to the rear of a military force is a potential enemy, and will sacrifice their life at the least sign of resistance/non-compliance.  Unfortunately, "scorched Earth" creates a very large amount of "collateral damage", but it is the most effective means of neutralizing an enemy, while  minimizing one's own personnel losses.
SALADIN - THE LAST HUMAN MUSLIM WARLORD!

The question is, "Who is willing to recognize the war that has been declared, and is willing to do what must be done in order to prevail?"  What nation, or group of nations, is willing to be labeled the "bad guy" by much of the world?  To permit the continuation of terrorism - in the name of Political Correctness - is to insure the establishment of their World Caliphate, and the defeat of freedom-loving people everywhere!  That's my 2¢ worth.
LET THE RESPONSE TO THE CRUSADE OF ISLAM BEGIN!

Saturday, September 27, 2014

Jeh Johnson: Amnesty Will Cause Terrorists to ‘Come Forward’ and Submit Background Checks

Jeh Johnson doesn't have a CLUE about security, yet he is the Secretary of Homeland Security.  Just one more shining example of the appalling ignorance running rampant in the "Executve Branch" of our government.   Obozo has done everything he can to insure that the America we know and love becomes a skeleton of what it had been in the past.

I HOPE this CHANGE is something we can reverse, and the only thing "transparent" about his administration is that he is taking revenge upon We the People for something that was ended 151 years ago - by Abe Lincoln, on January 1, 1863.
Obozo continues to follow the (manu)scripts prepared by neo-Marxist Saul Alinsky (Rules for Radicals), and the combined efforts of Richard Cloward and Frances Piven (Cloward-Piven Strategy of Orchestrated Crisis) which seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.

Cloward and Piven were inspired by radical organizer and Hillary Clinton mentor Saul Alinsky. Alinsky's approach was dark genius; "Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system's failure to "live up" to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist "rule book" with a socialist one."
The Cloward-Piven Strategy took it one step further by instructing young socialists to, "...hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse."

So, here we are today... with a seemingly never-ending string of CRISES, and an ECONOMY that is teetering on the brink of BANKRUPTCY. Of course, the left will blame it all on Bush the Younger, and a Congress in which the Republicans/Conservative have created stumbling blocks that cannot be overcome. This would be done in an attempt to justify and legitimize the improper use of Executive Orders by Obozo... our first undocumented president. Legitimacy aside, there is little question that our "Ship of State" is crewed by an agglomeration of idiots, and that ship is named HMS TITANIC!


 God save us from the stupidity of ignorant, one-issue American voters! Jeh Johnson could well-be the poster child for "Ineptitude of Government Officials"... and, that's my 2¢!

Saturday, September 20, 2014

Our Government's Focus In the "War on Terrorism" Is Americans...


Would you like to know where our government is putting it's emphasis on terrorism? Right here in the USA... but the focus is upon US! Here's an excerpt from WND:
"(Attorney General Eric) Holder believed, said Chumley, “America’s biggest threat is Americans with guns – not ISIS terrorists with a stated goal of spreading the caliphate throughout the world.”

“And that’s why ISIS continues to spread, and will continue to spread,” she said.

WND reported last week a case against an alleged Muslim terrorist who reportedly described his brutal killing of New Jersey teen Brendan Tevlin “for being American” as a “just kill.”

“It was, in fact, an act of jihad, perpetrated by a fellow American who sympathized more with those who want to annihilate us than with his own country and its people,” said radio host Todd Pettengill of “The Todd Show” on WPLJ in New York City.

He recounted the declaration by the suspect, Ali Muhammad Brown, 29, that the June 25 attack was a “just kill.”

“Domestic terrorism, no matter what the president says, is already here,” he warned.

During the first few weeks of his presidency, Obama spotlighted what he saw as a serious “right-wing” threat."

The "right-wing" is, of course, American patriots who believe in our Constitution's Bill of Rights, and hold in disdain those who attempt to thwart the intent of that document. For more details on the WND report, go to: http://www.wnd.com/2014/09/terror-threat-government-watching-for-americans-with-guns/ 
That's my 2¢ worth!

Wednesday, August 6, 2014

Representative Mo Brooks Claims Discriminating Against Whites Is Legal...

Representative Mo Brooks (R- Ala) recently said, "If you look at current federal law, there is only one skin color that you can lawfully discriminate against. That’s Caucasians — whites."

As I see things, it's not so much that we can legally be discriminated against, it is that ALL OTHERS have been put into a legally PROTECTED CLASS in which whites and Christians were intentionally not included. The law does NOT say, "It's legal to discriminate against white people", it just doesn't give whites the special protections that "minority groups" enjoy. This arrangement ignorantly presupposes that whites are the only race that improperly discriminates against others.

Discrimination is a product of prejudice, and prejudice is a LEARNED behavior - there is no innate "dislike of the unlike". People are not BORN instinctively 'hating' ANYBODY for any reason... they acquire their dislikes from interactions with others. Some prejudices are inherited, much as physical characteristics are inherited. The "authority figures" in one's life, have great influence upon the nurturing development of one's personality and character.

If Dad and/or Mom have a strong dislike of people of color, that dislike will be taught - unthinkingly, subliminally, or intentionally - to the child. But, our "authority figures" range far afield - teachers, clergy, peers and the extended family, compose those who influence our development. If the hate mantra is repeated often enough by many (or most) of those figures it becomes ingrained, because the expression of identical feelings are reinforced by praise and recognition from those we consider "important" in our life. Such 'learning' is not entirely inherited, some is based upon personal interactions and negative experiences... BUT, the background of prejudices expressed by others, does make one hyper-vigilant when dealing with those who are 'different'.
The "bottom line", however, is that when there are SPECIAL PROTECTIONS put in place for SOME, there is no longer "EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW" as established by the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Equal Protection Clause was implemented to ensure the fair treatment of ALL legal citizens of the United States. That's my 2¢ worth...
THE RELIGION OF "PEACE AND LOVE" - EMBRACE IT!



Saturday, July 26, 2014

Understanding Obama's Actions... from MY Perspective

It seems that many people either don't understand Oblamer's background and training, and automatically assume that he is "stupid". First of all he was ostensibly "elected" to the office by a majority of voters, and with the blessings of the Electoral College. This says more about the ignorance of our voters than it does about Oblamer. It also assumes that the election was FAIR, and that those 100% Obama precincts in various parts of the country, were NOT an indication of voter fraud or systemic corruption. Two really BIG assumptions!

Oblamer, as are we all, is a product of both nurture and nature. He was raised in a family of Communist/Socialist/Marxists. His father was an anti-western Muslim, and Oblamer attended Muslim schools during his formative years. He was mentored by the likes of Jeremiah Wright and Frank Marshall Davis (anti-white, anti-American Communist). The anti-white, anti-American, anti-western, anti-capitalist authority figures continued through his higher education, as well. These included professor Edward Said at Columbia, a spokesman for Palestinian terrorists, and professor Derrick Bell at the Harvard Law School. Bell was an advocate of “critical race theory” — an uncritical mishmash of notions by a man who said that he saw his role as deliberately annoying white people. When he entered politics, he was embraced by William Ayers - a domestic terrorist who planted bombs in public places, including the Pentagon. Ayers hosted fundraisers for Oblamer.

A critical look at his background makes it crystal clear that what many, if not MOST people see as mistakes and failed policies, are actually SUCCESSES to Oblamer. Each 'error' is carefully crafted based upon what is a foreign ideology to most Americans. His goal is to embarrass us internationally and destroy our economy, reducing the United States to the poverty level of some third-world, Banana Republic... like his birthplace of Kenya!

Oblamer is a charlatan, a conman, a snake-oil salesman... or, in a single word, a POLITICIAN. He is also so successful in pulling off those scams, he has become the consummate usurper. Unfortunately, he is also a hardwired Communist/Socialist/Marxist Muslim, who lied his way into the most powerful office in the free world, and is now busying himself with destroying that FREE WORLD. That's my 2¢ worth...

Sunday, April 13, 2014

TEN THINGS WE'VE LEARNED FROM THE BUNDY RANCH STANDOFF... SO FAR.

According to "Survival Joe" there are ten thing we have learned from the Bundy Ranch standoff in Nevada.  I can find nothing in his list with which to take issue, so for those of you who have not seen it, here it is (Fair Use applies):
"Here are 10 things we’ve learned from the Bundy Ranch standoff so far:
#1. The federal government has absolutely no respect for state rights.
#2. If we are to believe the BLM, they care more about the “rights” of desert tortoises than the rights of human beings.
#3. Force is the only language the BLM knows how to speak. This bureau is just as bad as any other power-tripping government agency, of which there are many: CIA, FBI, NSA, NEA, EPA, ATF, FDA, etc.
#4. Nevada Senator Harry Reid is perhaps the greediest and most corrupt politician in Washington. (Actually, we already knew that, but this just reinforces it.)
#5. All those Nevadans who have positions of authority in the government (Governor Brian Sandoval, Clark County Sheriff Douglas Gillespie, cCounty Commissioner Tom Collins, etc.) are either complicit with the federal government’s attempt to steal the Bundy’s cattle or they are too scared to do anything about it.
#6. Whenever the government offers justification for the use of force, there is always a stated reason — the pretext — and then there is the real reason, which usually has to do with profits and power. In the case of the BLM’s cattle-grab, the pretext was to protect the desert tortoise. The real reason was to build a solar farm.
#7. When Americans show up in numbers to oppose illegal government action, the Feds back down.
#8. The Feds have no problem spilling American blood on foreign soil (using drone strikes), but are not yet ready to openly spill American blood on American soil. (As “Phil Dirt” pointed out in the comments, the federal government has killed Americans on American soil — David Koresh and his followers being the most obvious example — but it has always been done under some kind of pretense.)
#9. If something like this can happen in Nevada, it can happen in any of the other 49 states.
#10. There is no limit to what the federal government will do to strip states of their sovereignty and further enslave the American people."
Any questions?

Sunday, February 2, 2014

GOP Establishment Secretly Pining for Mitt Romney in 2016?

Unfortunately, Mitt Romney is not a strong conservative candidate, and conservative VOTERS tend to follow their own personal convictions when they vote. Romney is not tremendously popular among grassroots Republican, either. On the other hand, Hillary IS a strong Democrat candidate. She is well-liked within the party, simply because the Dems will support their own... regardless of their lack of qualifications (as was demonstrated in 2008 and 2012).

Romney lost his first bid to become POTUS for several reasons, not the least of which is: Republicans and conservatives need AT LEAST a quasi-valid reason to vote for a candidate! Put a "D" behind Vladimir Putin's name, appoint Satan HIMSELF as his campaign manager, and the Dem's WILL vote for him!

Please don't misunderstand... I don't classify Mitt Romney as a "bad guy". Unfortunately that is another reason for his failed campaign. He is TOO NICE... too much of a gentleman to "roll around in the mud" with his opponent! Romney stays on the high ground and takes the shots, while his opponent takes cover behind trees and in the trenches, and snipes at him.

There is also the religious issue to be overcome. Many people misunderstand the LDS/"Mormon" religion, and do not see it as a qualifying "Christian" religion. The "Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints" has been wrongly classified as a "cult religion" because their method of worship and their internal rituals are somewhat foreign to mainstream Christianity.

People whose sense of honor is stronger than their sense of survival, rarely do well in politics - especially at the national level. They are ill-prepared to face the street-fighters ensconced within the walls and halls of the Capitol Building.

Romney needs to train like Rocky Balboa, but he seems to lack that "Rocky" hunger. He gave the subconscious impression that he didn't really care if he won the most prestigious office on planet Earth. He does not radiate the strength of character that conservative voters desire in a candidate, even though he does seem to possess that quality.

I'm afraid that if Mitt is the best candidate they have, the GOP - and the USA - will lose once again. Being the best person is NOT the same as being the BEST CANDIDATE! And that's my 2¢ worth.




Sunday, January 19, 2014

MOVIE REVIEW - "LONE SURVIVOR" - 5 out of 5 stars

Our Navy SEALS receive the most punishing physical and psychological training in the world! It borders upon cruel and unusual punishment! They are highly focused individuals who, by nature, do not believe in quitting before the job is finished. They can go without food, drink or sleep for extended periods, they can be isolated on a mountain top or in a desert for days without moving, if that's what the mission requires. These brave, dedicated men perform almost superhuman feats of endurance at the direction of the "leaders" of our once-great nation, knowing full-well that the odds do not favor their return.

My comments above are not meant to diminish the performance or sacrifices of our other special military teams (Spec'l Forces, Delta Force, etc), as they are all MEN among men, head and shoulders above the crowd - but this thread is not about them. We should all be thankful that we have men of such fortitude and courage serving us, and respect and honor them!

The movie itself is exceptionally well-done. Based upon a true story, the story line, acting, cinematography, and special effects were all exceptional. The experience was "almost like being there" (without wagering my own life). I felt like these were men I knew and respected.  There were only two other movies in my life that I have left feeling "uneasy"... Black Hawk Down and We Were Soldiers. If you can afford the price of a ticket (and many can't at today's high prices) Lone Survivor is well-worth seeing!

Friday, January 10, 2014

HERE'S A BIT OF GOVERNMENT IRONY...

Regarding same-sex committed relationships. According to AG Eric Holder, "This ruling (the high court's June decision) marked a historic step toward equality for all American families," Holder said. "And since the day it was handed down, the Department of Justice has been working tirelessly to implement it in both letter and spirit."

Congress would not allow Utah to be annexed as a state unless the Utah state constitution would outlaw polygamy (one husband with multiple wives). Also, the US government began seizing church property; but gave it back once polygamy was outlawed. A "family" is not constituted of people of the same sex - "As the basic unit for raising children, anthropologists most generally classify family organization as matrifocal (a mother and her children); conjugal (a husband, his wife, and children; also called nuclear family); avuncular (for example a brother, his sister, and her children); or extended family in which parents and children co-reside with other members of one parent's family."

The polygamous family is as much - if not MORE - of a "family" than one headed by people of the same sex, who cannot produce children or continue a family bloodline. Perhaps polygamy should be legalized, if a state's right to not recognize same-sex marriages are unconstitutional. The legalization of same-sex "marriages" is (ostensibly) based upon "equal protection under the law". I'm sure there a sheep-lovers who would like to "marry" one of their flock also, so let's legalize that while we're at it. There are also those perverts who would enjoy having sex with their own children, so let's let them get "married" too! They are equally entitled to the protection of the law. Of course, NEITHER of those suggestions are made seriously, but rather to point out the wrong thinking behind same-sex "marriages".

The compromise solution to the resistance against same-sex relationships may simply be in the desired appellation itself. Reserve the definition of "marriage" in it's originally intended context, and use "Civil Union" to describe same-sex committed relationships. There is no harm in allowing them the same privileges as those of a "married" man-woman relationship, but the thrust of the argument by gays seems to be one of SEMANTICS, as opposed to something more practical! Legal recognition would provide gays with 100% of something, fighting over semantics may bring them 100% of nothing.

The "Log Cabin Republicans", composed of gays who vote Republican, are supporting same-sex "marriage". Which begs the question, how far do they wish to push the "log" into the "cabin"? Just my 2¢ worth.