Goodbye Barry - Welcome Home AMERICA!

Showing posts with label One World Government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label One World Government. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Are You Ready For The GLOBAL ONE-WORLD CURRENCY?

In late March 2009 US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner confessed that he had not read the plans by China's central bank governor for a "super-sovereign reserve currency" run by the International Monetary Fund, but nevertheless let slip that Washington was "open" to the idea. China's suggestion – backed by Russia, Brazil, and India, is clearly aimed at breaking US dollar hegemony.

In July of this year, at the G8 Summit in Italy, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev illustrated his call for a supranational currency to replace the dollar by pulling from his pocket a sample coin of a “united future world currency.”
The coin, which bears the words “unity in diversity,” was minted in Belgium and presented to the heads of G-8 delegations, Medvedev said.

In early September of this year the U.N. said the U.S. dollar should be replaced with a global currency.

In mid-November, the head of the International Monetary Fund proclaimed, "The imperative of greater global currency stability means the world can no longer rely, as it has done since the end of the gold standard, on a currency issued by a single country."

Is this the first step toward the long-rumored One World Government? The New World Order? Will you not be able to buy or sell without it... could it be "the mark of the beast"? It appears that most of the world is aligned to accept this global currency, and at first glance it may be appealing, but... if it is controlled by the International Monetary Fund, the whoever controls the IMF controls currency of the world, and by logical extension controls THE WORLD! How's that grab ya, Bubba? There will be no more sovereign nations, no more Constitution, no more freedoms - other than those permitted by Big Brother. True freedom needs no permission! Yet there are those among us who will welcome their enslavement - as long as Big Brother puts beans on their table. And I will tread upon their decaying bodies as I march/walk/crawl to engage those who would dare to attempt to rule free men! Live free or die is more than just an idea - it's an ideal, a credo and a value.
WAKE UP AMERICA!!

Saturday, September 26, 2009

You Might Be A Domestic Terrorist If...

According to several sources, including the Department of Homeland Security, the Southern Poverty Law Center, and the entire left-wing media, you may be a domestic terrorist if:
  • You oppose "abortion on demand"
  • You are a returning veteran
  • You oppose same-sex "marriage"
  • You oppose unreasonable restrictions on the legitimate ownership of firearms
  • You oppose lax (or eliminating) immigration laws
  • You oppose the policies of President Obama regarding immigration, citizenship, and the expansion of social programs
  • You oppose continuation of "free trade" agreements
  • You are suspect of foreign regimes (you know - like those people who want us DEAD)
  • You fear communist regimes (or fear that our country is being converted to one)
  • You oppose a "One World" government (or a gigantic global dictatorship)
  • You bemoan the decline of U.S. stature in the world (should it be a cause for celebration?)
  • You are upset over the loss of U.S. manufacturing jobs to China, India and others (isn't outsourcing American jobs to foreign countries, while we have 15,000,000 unemployed U.S. citizens, something worth being a bit "upset" over? Perhaps we need to outsource our government in order to get their attention!) and...
  • You will be labeled a "domestic terrorist" if you disagree with the left-wing, socialist-"progressives" on any issue. Dissent, by anyone other than themselves, is not permitted in their world.




Saturday, July 4, 2009

Conspiracy 101 - Conspiracy Theories Abound!

This is going to be a "quick and dirty" guide to conspiracy theories, for the person with a desire to know less than everything about those theories... a familiarization exercise. Everybody has their favorite conspiracy theory. And, for those who lack sufficient imagination to create one of their very own, there are numerous CTs available for them to buy into.

Among the most popular conspiracy theories are those surrounding the Bilderbergs, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Illuminati, the Skull and Bones Society, and the Trilateral Commission. There are many more... enough to make you extremely paranoid, especially if you believe 100% of what they each suggest. There are even those which put forth the idea that the Free and Accepted Masons (or just "Masons", as most of us know them) are a continuation of the philosophical and political line of the Knights Templar - eliminated with great prejudice (i.e. killed) by order of King Philip of France in 1307.

The Bilderbergs are comprised of about 120 of the world's most powerful and influential "movers and shakers", including (among others) ex-Presidents Jimmy Carter and William Jefferson "Bill" Clinton; Lt. General Keith B. Alexander, Director of OUR National Security Agency; Timothy Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury; David Rockefeller (also CFR), and Craig Mundy, Microsoft USA, etc., etc. The membership rolls read like a "Who's Who" of economics, education, finance, government, industry, media, pharmaceuticals, and technology! (http://www.scribd.com/doc/15684752/Bilderberg-Meeting-2009-Greece-Complete-Members-List)

The Council on Foreign Realtions includes such notables as - Ambassador Madeleine Albright, Walter F. "Fritz" Mondale, George Cabot Lodge, Irving R. Levine, Special Envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard C. Holbrooke, etc. Another laundry list of over 4,000 international power brokers in economics, education, finance, government, industry, media, pharmaceuticals, and technology!

The Illuminati are probably the most secret of the "secret societies", and little is known about their existence prior to 1776. Credit is given to Adam Weishaupt, of Ingolstadt Bavaria, as the founder of the modern-day Illuminati on May 1, 1776. Theorists have claimed that many notable people were or are members of the Illuminati, including Winston Churchill, David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski. Although I don't know that anybody outside the Illuminati has ever seen an Illuminati membership list, the order does exist... at least in name, and in some form or another. Being technologically savvy and proficient, they even have a web site -(http://illuminati-order.com/join.html)

Most of us have heard of the "Skull and Bones Society" - if only by way of the 2004 motion picture The Skulls - but very few of us have ever experienced being a "Bonesman". Again, the membership at Yale University is elitist in nature, currying the male offspring of bankers, politicians, industrialists, lawyers, and assorted power brokers to take their "rightful place" in controlling society. Several generations of the Bush family were/are "Bonesmen", going back to George Ws grandfather, Prescott Bush (Yale 1917), and forward to uncles, father George H. and to Gee-Dubbya himself. This is where the networking begins and where alliances are created to further the ambitions of... whom? These people are not brought to Yale's Skull and Bones Society by accident. The Skull and Bones is a gateway... an investment of indoctrination in the ways of "the shadow world". It is a training ground for the power brokers of tomorrow. Inasmuch as it is a secret society I can only provide these vague generalities about its intent and mechanisms.

The Trilateral Commission - affectionately known as the "TriLats" - is another multinational NGO (non-governmental organization) which is responsible to no one... yet they exert influence over virtually everyone. Several hundred names comprise the membership, and I will list just a few of the more recognizable names representing the USA: former Ambassador and Secretary of State Madeleine Albright; George Herbert Walker Bush, former President of the USA; Zbigniew Brzezinski, former Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs; Richard B. "Dick" Cheney, former Vice President; Richard C. Holbrooke, Special Envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan; Samuel C. Johnson, Director, Mobil Corp.; Thomas G. Labrecque, President Chase Manhattan Bank; Cyrus R. Vance, Director, Manufacturers Hanover Bank. And there are hundreds more from the USA and around the world!

Now, at the risk of boring you, here a a few quotable quotes from names you might recognize:
"The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes." Benjamin Disraeli, first Prime Minister of England, in a novel he published in 1844 called Coningsby, the New Generation

"Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 LA Riot]. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond [i.e., an "extraterrestrial" invasion], whether real or *promulgated* [emphasis mine], that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this *scenario*, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government." Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991

"In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all." Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, 1992.

"Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had mens views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the Field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it." Woodrow Wilson,The New Freedom (1913)

"We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world." Professor Arnold Toynbee, in a June 1931 speech before the Institute for the Study of International Affairs in Copenhagen.

By now you're probably wondering, "So, what's your point?" I tend to believe in the old adage, "Where there's smoke there's fire." As I said in beginning this post, there's a conspiracy theory for everybody, and when I play connect the dots the common thread connecting these CTs is a unified, secular, one-world government, with a world currency (I also infer a world military), controlled by a class of ruling elite. Here's my reasoning:
  • Each of the aforementioned organizations has one other thing in common - multinationalism. It is beyond my ability to believe that all these many nations are working for the betterment of each individual nation in its sovereign state.
  • The establishment of the European Union was the beginning of what I see as the final phase of creating the New World Order (we'll call that the "working title" for the Universal Global Government [UGG]).
  • The push for NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) is essentially a cloning of the EU economic experiment for the Americas - from Barrow, Alaska to Isla Herschel, Chile (off the southern tip of South America). "Trade" is not the only thing this agreement brings about... it essentially eliminates borders, and creates a single currency among the Americas (much like the Euro)
  • There is a concept in management called "span of control", which is shaped like a pyramid. This concept logically assumes that there are only so many things that one person can control. Lets look at it like a corporation - the higher up the pyramid one goes, the more responsibility they accumulate, but they also perform less actual "work". The CEO is at the top of the pyramid, beneath him are the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer, and beneath each of them are several Division Chiefs, who each have several Managers that they supervise, and so on down to the workers.
  • The UN is comprised of 192 individual and independent nation states, each with their own agenda to benefit their particular nation state. The "CEO" is the Secretary-General, and beneath him are the Security Council, the Economic and Social Council, the Trusteeship Council, and the International Court of Justice, and finally we get to the General Assembly. However, the internal structure of the UN is relatively unimportant - what is important is its external span of control.]
  • The establishment of the European Union was seen as a social experiment by much of the world, and the EU has, thus far, been a successful one. What most people don't realize is that it actually began in 1951, as the European Coal and Steel Community with just six member states. Little attention was paid to the EU until January 1, 1999, when the euro was introduced to world financial markets as an accounting currency. Then, in May of 2004, ten nations joined the EU, which doubled its membership at that time. Today there are twenty-seven member nations in the EU, sixteen of which have adopted a common currency called the "euro".
  • The problem with mega-states, such as the EU, is that at some point in time, they will develop - due to their sheer numbers - the ability to control trade within a region. Controlling trade is an excellent recruitment tool, which allows them - through intimidation and the fear of being cut off and isolated from resources which the "outer nations" may not have - to consume even more real estate.
  • Let's return to the UN now. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), being pushed by the UN, and strongly supported by the U.S. government is designed to "unify" the Americas in the EU fashion - turning it into a single, essentially borderless landmass, with a single currency and a centralized government. Think about how much easier it would be for a One World government to take control of 3 or 4 mega-states, than to gain control of 192 sovereign nations. The world would then become a dystopia, much like the ones presented in Fritz Lang's 1927 silent movie "Metropolis", Orwell's novel "1984", and Bradbury's "Fahrenheit 451". If you'd like to scare the hell out of yourself, watch the movies made of all three in a marathon! I'm not saying that this will happen, only that the potential for such a scenario does exist if/when all the pieces are put into place.
  • Who better than the UN to then take apparent control of the world? I say "apparent" because we may never know who the real power is behind the apparent power. The truly scary part of the UN is that our left-wing loonies, most of whom worship at the temple of the United Nations in New York City, are supporting the following, extracted from the United Nations "Declaration of Human Rights" (emphasis added to Article 29 (3)):
  • Article 29.

    (1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.

    (2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.

    (3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
  • Which brings me to my next scenario...
Suppose that there is even a modicum of truth to most - if not all - the established CTs. And imagine that the Bilderbergers, CFR, Illuminati, et al, are each operating under the assumption that they are the chosen ones. And suppose that there is an anonymous "puppet master" behind the scenes pulling the strings with promises of supreme power and control in the New World Order. Greed for power is a greater motivator for man than greed for mineral wealth, because with power one will gain gold, oil, gemstones or whatever the currency of the day may be. Will each of the groups be given a large chunk of geography? The Kingdom of Bilderberg? The Grand Duchy of CFR? The Principality of Illuminati? Perhaps. They may think they control huge parcels of land, but the real power will be reserved by the faceless, nameless, supreme manipulator(s) standing in the shadows.

And that is my personal CT - which, admitedly, is entirely based on supposition and conjecture. Connecting the factual dots in a purely "what if?" and "worst-case" scenario (being multi-national in organizational structure, I'm fairly certain that they are not all working to further the best interests of the United States of America.). There is certainly a possibility I could be wrong... but, the truly scary possibility is that I could be right!

Monday, March 30, 2009

Here's An Eye-Opener For The Sheep of The World

For those of you who think the United Nations is the savior of the world, the following was taken directly from the UN website (http://www.unhchr.ch/udhr/lang/eng.htm) under the heading of "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" (UDHR).:

"Article 29

1. Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.

2. In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to suchlimitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.

3. These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations."

The coloring and bold facing of the text was added by myself for emphasis - to make a point - but the words are theirs. That point being, the UN says we have rights and freedoms so long as they don't conflict with the interests of the UN (plans for world domination?). So, any freedom you may choose to exercise could be found to be "contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations" (even though "1984" is 25 years in the past, that phrase has a very Orwellian sound to it).

IF I believed all the lunatic "conspiracy theories" on the Internet, I would be in some totally uncontrollable maximum panic mode by now. I do, however, read and comprehend the English language... an ability which tells me that there is a very definite threat implied in the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Perhaps everybody needs to pay closer attention to what's going on in the world around us...

I could be wrong about this... I could also be a space alien from the planet Urantia (somebody call Las Vegas and get the odds on that!).

Saturday, June 21, 2008

United Nations - Those Who Would Rule The World

Our left-wing loonies, most of whom worship at the temple of the United Nations in New York City, are supporting the following, extracted from the United Nations "Declaration of Human Rights" (emphasis added to Article 29 (3)):

Article 29.

    (1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.

    (2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.

    (3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Congratulations, Article 29(3) has given you the right to agree with the UN (in their infinite wisdom)! According to (1) you also may fully develop your personality within the scope of your "duties" to the community (this sounds quite Orwellian to me ... shades of 1984). And then there's (2), wherein your "rights and freedoms" are restricted "as are determined by law", as distinguished from a Constitution - which is the basis for OUR laws. Exactly whose "laws" are we talking about here? The UN's laws? It couldn't possibly be the individual laws of each sovereign nation, because there are too many inconsistencies between the cultures - and therefore the laws - of each country. It would also be a virtual impossibility for any objective organization to accurately monitor and interpret 192 assorted laws covering a single infraction, misdemeanor or felony. So, it appears that the UN is out to establish a universal set of laws ... perhaps cloaked in the mantle of "International Law". Good luck with that!

I'm not claiming that there are no good aspects to the UN's UDoHR, there are many ... but they are, for the most part, vaguely worded and easily interpreted in any manner the reader desires. Am I the only person who has wondered (sometimes aloud to others) if the EU, and NAFTA (the obvious precursor to the North American Union, or perhaps just the American Union) are the first two steps to world domination by the UN? The third, and final step, would be the formation of the Asian Union - which, given the significant antagonism and distrust between most of the Asian countries, will be the greatest challenge of this unification project. It is much easier to exercise control over 3 entities than 192 independent ones. BUT, once the Asian Union has been accomplished through 'diplomacy' (read: intimidation and ostracism), there is only one obvious Puppet Master. What controlling body would be more apparent than the UN? There would be only one independent state left in the world - The Vatcian - assuming the UN allows them to retain their independent status , rather than incorporating the Vatican into Italy. You can use your own imagination for drawing further conclusions ... my imagination is fatigued!